Business

This panel will examine a multitude of issues involved in financing a chapter 11 exit, including the complications caused by a § 1111(b) election and plan treatment options. Feasibility issues, including balloon provisions and deed-in-lieu clauses, will also be discussed, as well as issues that arise when determining whether a plan is fair and equitable, including deferred payment clauses, interest rates, negative amortization, partial surrender of collateral, carve-outs and differing treatment of trade claims. Dirt-for-debt proposals might also be discussed, along with issues involving indubitable equivalence.

a. terminations (convenience/default) b. effect of FAR bankruptcy clause c. subprime/prime issues: rights of the subcontractor when the prime contractor files d. novation e. assignment of government contracts receivables f. effect of Assignment of Claims Act/UCC Speakers: Lawrence P. Block Stinson Leonard Street LLP; Washington, D.C. Hilary S. Cairnie BakerHostetler; Washington, D.C. Lawrence Sher Reed Smith LLP; Washington, D.C. Holly E. Svetz Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP; Tysons Corner, Va. Janet M. Nesse Stinson Leonard Street LLP; Washington, D.C. Christopher J. Giaimo BakerHostetler; Washington, D.C. Prof. Sally M. Henry Texas Tech University School of Law; Lubbock, Texas Hon. Thomas J. Catliota U.S. Bankruptcy Court (D. Md.); Greenbelt

a. the automatic stay and relief from the stay b. discrimination against the debtor, and how that affects termination c. setoff/recoupment d. buying assets in bankruptcy e. executory contracts issues f. claims by government agencies g. adversary proceedings and other litigation with the government h. employee claims i. interactions with the DOL, DOJ, etc. Speakers: Lawrence P. Block Stinson Leonard Street LLP; Washington, D.C. Hilary S. Cairnie BakerHostetler; Washington, D.C. Lawrence Sher Reed Smith LLP; Washington, D.C. Holly E. Svetz Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP; Tysons Corner, Va. Janet M. Nesse Stinson Leonard Street LLP; Washington, D.C. Christopher J. Giaimo BakerHostetler; Washington, D.C. Prof. Sally M. Henry Texas Tech University School of Law; Lubbock, Texas Hon. Thomas J. Catliota U.S. Bankruptcy Court (D. Md.); Greenbelt

Review of GSC case (bankruptcy court decision pending); what are the lessons of GSC for practitioners regarding disclosure, fee sharing, disinterestedness and conflicts, etc?; review of disinterestedness standards under § 101(14) and related disclosure requirements; additional ethics topic might include conflicts waivers (when is it necessary to obtain a waiver? Distinctions may be drawn based on current vs. recent vs. former clients, directly adverse vs. positionally adverse, relatedness to a prior matter, use of confidential information); Brown Publishing

A moderated roundtable featuring the judges of the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York

This panel will discuss the historic significance of the General Motors bankruptcy case with an in-depth discussion about the issuance of public units in a major bankruptcy. The session will also include the challenges addressed by the team and the value of a freely traded unit.

This panel will present strategies and tips for presenting financial evidence in chapter 11 cases. Panelists will discuss the selection, roles and fee arrangements of financial advisors and experts, employment applications/standards under the Bankruptcy Code, disclosure, protecting privilege, opinion testimony, use of demonstrative evidence, witness preparation and more.

Each affiliated debtor and its creditors have potentially conflicting interests in maximizing assets and minimizing claims, so how are these interests reconciled in multi-debtor cases?; can one board make decisions for all debtors?; when is an independent board or CRO needed to represent the interests of a particular business unit, and why don’t we see that more often?; how should one arrange intercompany DIP financing?; how should one ensure that all constituencies are represented and that key stakeholders are at the table?; should there be multiple creditors’ committees?; use of examiners and other third parties; increased use of motions seeking to disqualify counsel, mediators, etc.