Skip to main content

No CLE

Recent Issues in Plan Confirmation 1

Equitable mootness, releases, resuscitation of discharged claims, etc. (Owens Corning); § 1129(a)(10) in multi-debtor nonconsolidated cases (Charter, Tribune); treatment of make-whole provisions in a plan (Chemtura); facial nonconfirmability; vote designation; post-filing lock-up agreements
1 hour 9 minutes 33 seconds

Recent Issues in Plan Confirmation 2

Equitable mootness, releases, resuscitation of discharged claims, etc. (Owens Corning); § 1129(a)(10) in multi-debtor nonconsolidated cases (Charter, Tribune); treatment of make-whole provisions in a plan (Chemtura); facial nonconfirmability; vote designation; post-filing lock-up agreements
1 hour 12 minutes 46 seconds

Recovery Strategies: Intercompany Claims, Corporate Structure Issues and Unsecured Claim Valuation

The issue of "double-dipping", wherein a creditor is able to increase its recovery by multiplying its allowed claim against a particular entity or asserting claims against multiple entities, has been prevalent in a number of recent restructurings, including American Airlines, Lehman Brothers, CIT Group Inc., Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. and AbitibiBowater Inc. This panel will address the concept of "double-dipping", the scenarios under which it arises and their experience in dealing with the issue in various cases.

Report Preparation in the Context of Daubert

How are an expert's qualifications and the relevance and reliability of the expert's opinions assessed by courts? What do attorneys expect from experts and what do experts expect from attorneys? A panel of attorneys and valuation experts discuss the criteria for expert qualification, the methodological components of reliability and offer guidance on avoiding pitfalls and bad opinions when working with experts. The panel also provides recent statistics on Daubert challenges.
1 hour 12 minutes 36 seconds

Resolving Complex Financial Institutions: Chapter 14, OLA and Living Wills

Are any financial institutions “too big to fail”? Since the financial crisis of 2008, governments, financial institutions, practitioners and academics have debated, proposed and in some instances implemented provisions to reduce the likelihood that a failure by a systemically important financial institution would cause systemic risk. This panel will discuss the failures of U.S. financial institutions and the current and prospective measures to facilitate the resolution of these institutions without transmitting risk to the U.S. financial system.