Search Topics
Bankruptcy 2026: Views from the Bench
ABI’s Bankruptcy 2026: Views from the Bench program is a unique opportunity for bankruptcy practitioners to hear from more than 20 sitting and retired bankruptcy judges during a full day of high-quality CLE and networking opportunities. This year’s program was held at the Georgetown University Law Center.
AI and the Bench: Ethics, Evidence, Privilege, and Candor in the Age of AI
This panel addresses pressing issues related to the use of AI in the courtroom and the use of AI by the bankruptcy courts. The panelists focus on ethical issues related to the obligation of candor to the court, use of evidence, discovery and privilege issues, and the how the existing rules do or do not adequately address the current and expected AI landscape.Learning ObjectivesAttendees will recognize the ethical obligations of candor to the court when AI tools are used in preparing filings, evidence, or arguments.Attendees will examine emerging evidentiary, discovery, and privilege issues arising from the use of AI by litigants and the courts.Attendees will assess the adequacy of existing rules and standards in addressing current and anticipated uses of AI in bankruptcy practice.
Subchapter V in the Trenches: Small Cases, Big Questions
This panel discusses hot topics and frequent pitfalls in subchapter V cases.Learning ObjectivesAttendees will identify common eligibility issues and disputes that arise in subchapter V cases.Attendees will examine the role of the subchapter V trustee and recurring issues in plan confirmation, including feasibility and the absolute priority rule.Attendees will develop practical strategies for navigating the compressed timelines and procedural challenges unique to subchapter V practice.
Great Debates
Debate 1: RESOLVED, that it is permissible, and may be appropriate, for a judge, with the express consent of the parties, to serve as a mediator in a case that is pending before that judge.Debate 2: RESOLVED, that in a chapter 15 case, a bankruptcy court should recognize and enforce a foreign restructuring that includes a third-party release even if the debtor is headquartered in the U.S. but filed abroad for the purpose of circumventing the rule of Purdue Pharma.Learning ObjectivesAttendees will evaluate the ethical and practical considerations surrounding judicial participation as a mediator in a case pending before that judge.Attendees will analyze the legal and policy arguments for and against recognizing foreign restructurings containing third-party releases under chapter 15.Attendees will assess the implications of Purdue Pharma on forum selection strategies and cross-border restructuring practice.
e-Learning Topics
Filter by Approved State
Most Popular Live Sessions
Join live sessions your peers are attending now.