Debate 1: RESOLVED, that it is permissible, and may be appropriate, for a judge, with the express consent of the parties, to serve as a mediator in a case that is pending before that judge.Debate 2: RESOLVED, that in a chapter 15 case, a bankruptcy court should recognize and enforce a foreign restructuring that includes a third-party release even if the debtor is headquartered in the U.S. but filed abroad for the purpose of circumventing the rule of Purdue Pharma.Learning ObjectivesAttendees will evaluate the ethical and practical considerations surrounding judicial participation as a mediator in a case pending before that judge.Attendees will analyze the legal and policy arguments for and against recognizing foreign restructurings containing third-party releases under chapter 15.Attendees will assess the implications of Purdue Pharma on forum selection strategies and cross-border restructuring practice.