Professional Compensation/Fees

This is the first in our new series on understanding basic ethics concepts. This panel will address the classic conflict problems that exist for business and consumer attorneys when they are retained. More advanced discussion points will focus on representing multiple entities or individuals in cases.

This panel will address issues concerning confidentiality and privileged information, fees, candor in dealings with the court, fairness to opposing counsel, and more, with reference to various Rules of Professional Conduct, including RPCs 1.5, 1.6, 3.3, 3.4 and 8.4.

This session includes a review of best practices for obtaining attorneys’ fees and the new CARA form.

This panel will address disclosure issues relating to disinterestedness, compensation and reimbursement requirements, compensation of fees incurred defending fee applications, and flat-fee arrangements between chapter 7 debtors and counsel, and other issues.

John W. Lucas, Moderator Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP; San Francisco Judicial Debate Resolved: The “disinterestedness” requirement should be strictly enforced under § 327 (no waivers or ethical walls). Pro: Hon. Randall L. Dunn U.S. Bankruptcy Court (D. Or.); Portland Con: Hon. Madeleine C. Wanslee U.S. Bankruptcy Court (D. Ariz.); Phoenix Business Debate Resolved: Acceleration of a debt obligation under a credit agreement should act to prevent the lender from enforcing a prepayment premium Pro: Lori Sinanyan Jones Day; Los Angeles Con: Michael H. Strub, Jr. Irell & Manella LLP; Newport Beach, Calif. Consumer Debate Resolved: Attorneys should be permitted to unbundle services under an engagement agreement with a consumer debtor. Pro: Samuel A. Schwartz The Schwartz Law Firm, Inc.; Las Vegas Con: John R. Bollinger Boleman Law Firm, P.C.; Hampton, Va.

The assets of professional services firms ride the proverbial elevator every day. What happens when they stop riding? This session will address the insolvency of professional service firms, including the causes of professional service firm insolvencies, the status of partner capital, and the risks to the professionals who once rode the elevators, including potential preference and fraudulent transfer liability. This program will also review recent cases relating to the “unfinished business” doctrine in the context of law firm insolvencies. Finally, the program will examine challenges in effecting a distressed merger of professional services firms.

This panel will focus on the possible consequences of ASARCO, Wellness, and Bank of America v. Caulkett