Bankruptcy Litigation

Sponsored by Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP

This panel will discuss pre-appeal considerations, final or interlocutory orders, stays pending appeal, perfecting an appeal, appellate briefs, and direct appeals to circuit courts.

A trial is fraught with opportunities for lawyers on both sides to make mistakes. By using hypotheticals infused with current and common issues, this panel will provide useful tips for successful examination and cross-examination, preparation for common motion practice, and laying a proper foundation for submission of evidence.

Think you can cross-examine the opposing expert on her/his opinions that have been rejected or criticized in the past? Not so fast. What’s the appropriate premise of value? How many feet from the deathbed does the debtor have to be to adopt a liquidation premise? Does satisfaction of a contractual obligation conclusively establish reasonably equivalent value? Must you also avoid the obligation? What are the ways to establish compliance with industry standards under § 547(c)(2)? Will a fact witness suffice? What do you do when the opposing expert (or your own!) offers an opinion that’s not disclosed in the expert’s report? This panel of experts, litigators and a retiring judge will tackle these common-but-complex evidentiary issues.

This discussion will enhance the cross-examination skills of both new and seasoned litigators.

This panel will first discuss lessons learned from the extensive litigation over the past few years on “drop-down” and “up-tier” restructuring transactions in such cases as Murray Energy, Serta Simmons, TriMark, Boardriders, iHeart, La Paloma and White Box v. Trans Ocean. Next, we will examine some recent developments in fraudulent conveyance litigation, including challenges to transfers made in “Texas two-step” mergers (e.g., J&J); establishing fraudulent intent (Tribune); and recovering from subsequent transferees (e.g., Giant Gray; Madoff). Finally, we will discuss developments on equitable mootness, which continues to be litigated with differing results around the country.

What privileges and confidentiality can be asserted in bankruptcy litigation (e.g., attorney/client, common interest, mediation, etc.), and how do you invoke and preserve these various privileges/confidentialities? This session will identify these issues and address the ethical and legal implications if they they aren’t properly preserved.